tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post791540168190600389..comments2024-03-26T15:41:17.093+08:00Comments on 電腦玩物: Scriptish 性能快、功能多的Firefox 4專用增強版GreasemonkeyEsor Huanghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10426807330996372963noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-86724997015525831432012-05-19T15:22:25.414+08:002012-05-19T15:22:25.414+08:00從火狐四到現在已經14了
我剛好又重灌電腦火狐清空
現在的scriptish跟Greasemon...從火狐四到現在已經14了<br /><br />我剛好又重灌電腦火狐清空<br /><br />現在的scriptish跟Greasemonkey<br />還是跟這篇的關係一樣嗎?<br /><br />不知道有沒有值得一提的更新<br />又要二選一了0.0葉子https://www.blogger.com/profile/10613617189565248192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-52900618189247135622011-08-08T00:26:52.984+08:002011-08-08T00:26:52.984+08:00对性能已经没有什么要求,兼容稳定就行了对性能已经没有什么要求,兼容稳定就行了Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-36747354594588776442011-06-27T13:45:15.382+08:002011-06-27T13:45:15.382+08:00Scriptish很容昜在托曳出的新分頁失效,需要在新分頁上再重載入分頁script才會啟動。Scriptish很容昜在托曳出的新分頁失效,需要在新分頁上再重載入分頁script才會啟動。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-21963927249064789632011-05-01T22:54:02.142+08:002011-05-01T22:54:02.142+08:00感謝推薦~~感謝推薦~~Esor Huanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10426807330996372963noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-73350181542740576512011-05-01T14:21:07.649+08:002011-05-01T14:21:07.649+08:00http://code.google.com/p/greasefire/issues/detail?...http://code.google.com/p/greasefire/issues/detail?id=21<br /><br />我分支的 Greasefire ,<br />目前最新版本可以支援scriptfish,歡迎試試看。XD<br /><br />可以先看看demo :)<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F84TrWadGlkAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03507259905104004293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-10113350320826261322011-04-29T23:19:07.281+08:002011-04-29T23:19:07.281+08:00TO 匿名
我是 facebook switch accounts 作者,剛剛裝上 Scripti...TO 匿名<br /><br />我是 facebook switch accounts 作者,剛剛裝上 Scriptish 很正常再跑,請問是哪裡有問題呢?Mesak.twhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14177541782433262444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-38813774988921573712011-04-27T00:00:48.102+08:002011-04-27T00:00:48.102+08:00其實根據我trace greasefire 的心得,
應該不難port才對,找時間研究看看。其實根據我trace greasefire 的心得,<br />應該不難port才對,找時間研究看看。Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03507259905104004293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-49436480613055323832011-04-06T14:08:31.880+08:002011-04-06T14:08:31.880+08:00沒有耶沒有耶Esor Huanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10426807330996372963noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-62722299209821578372011-04-04T02:24:42.600+08:002011-04-04T02:24:42.600+08:00請問異塵大大
油猴的好朋友GreaseFire
有替代的套件嗎請問異塵大大<br />油猴的好朋友GreaseFire<br />有替代的套件嗎Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-73539153862954255992011-03-28T20:33:28.587+08:002011-03-28T20:33:28.587+08:00@匿名:
有沒有 Greasefire 等問題,作者有解答的.請多看 Addons Page: ht...@匿名:<br />有沒有 Greasefire 等問題,作者有解答的.請多看 Addons Page: https://addons.mozilla.org/zh-tw/firefox/addon/scriptish/<br /><br />There is no Greasefire part<br />由 Erik Vold (開發者) 發表於 March 19, 2011 #<br /><br />Greasefire is a separate extension, I can't support it without conflicting with Greasemonkey, so Greasefire will need to be modified, not Scriptish.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-58534105636273172872011-03-28T17:29:03.188+08:002011-03-28T17:29:03.188+08:00在我这有个脚本不支持,还是继续greasemonkey在我这有个脚本不支持,还是继续greasemonkeyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-89470896664007035802011-03-28T16:05:07.384+08:002011-03-28T16:05:07.384+08:00剛剛回的回應好像不見了?
我在兩台電腦上兩個套件都有裝
用了一個月在感覺上來說速度都差不多...
...剛剛回的回應好像不見了?<br /><br />我在兩台電腦上兩個套件都有裝<br />用了一個月在感覺上來說速度都差不多...<br /><br />不過好像大多數人都比較推這套Scriptish的樣子@@<br />反正用起來也差不多,乾脆就把猴子停用改替換成這套Scriptish好了...貓noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-5113280662153304052011-03-28T15:21:17.721+08:002011-03-28T15:21:17.721+08:00看到這個我也很好奇
因為我覺得兩個套件真的程度上差不多
而且雖然說號稱比原來的油猴子要優化
但是好像...看到這個我也很好奇<br />因為我覺得兩個套件真的程度上差不多<br />而且雖然說號稱比原來的油猴子要優化<br />但是好像也沒有人實際做過任何測試<br /><br />當然,一堆高手都沒有法子測試了我當然也沒辦法<br />所以就採取最直覺的方式,也就是兩套都裝來試試看<br />我在兩台不同的電腦上使用不同的套件來試試看<br />使用上已經過了一個月了吧,還是感覺不出誰優誰劣<br />我想這只能代表這兩個套件確實都很強吧...貓noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-67582691155370877942011-03-28T00:50:07.552+08:002011-03-28T00:50:07.552+08:00不能使用不能使用Esor Huanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10426807330996372963noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-58081526830740303592011-03-27T23:27:27.600+08:002011-03-27T23:27:27.600+08:00GM有搭配的元件是greasefire,scripts有嗎?GM有搭配的元件是greasefire,scripts有嗎?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-11541868739765594162011-03-27T17:55:41.074+08:002011-03-27T17:55:41.074+08:00@匿名20:
意思就是fx將會愈來愈快就是了,讚~~^^@匿名20:<br /><br />意思就是fx將會愈來愈快就是了,讚~~^^Esor Huanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10426807330996372963noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-74547614093595900042011-03-27T17:50:22.262+08:002011-03-27T17:50:22.262+08:00更正一下,是type inference更正一下,是type inferenceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-19151489957079757992011-03-27T17:48:45.371+08:002011-03-27T17:48:45.371+08:00離題一下,4.2a1nightly版在處理javascript上已有改進,大概是增加TM的緣故
s...離題一下,4.2a1nightly版在處理javascript上已有改進,大概是增加TM的緣故<br /><br />sunspider5次平均:<br />firefox 4 release : 202ms<br />IE9 : 190ms<br />minefiled 4.2a1 : 180ms<br />當然還是不建議一般人踩地雷Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-61275633795556320072011-03-27T15:44:44.802+08:002011-03-27T15:44:44.802+08:00原来新版greasemonkey取消方便添加排除网址的功能,真是不方便,试试这个原来新版greasemonkey取消方便添加排除网址的功能,真是不方便,试试这个Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-28314358568890867452011-03-27T15:27:47.311+08:002011-03-27T15:27:47.311+08:00沒有自動轉移機制,也不代表一定要重新安裝scripts的,因為... 可以手動轉移的:
Manual...沒有自動轉移機制,也不代表一定要重新安裝scripts的,因為... 可以手動轉移的:<br />Manually transfer user scripts from Greasemonkey to Scriptish <br />https://github.com/erikvold/scriptish/wiki/How-To%3A--Manually-transfer-user-scripts-from-Greasemonkey-to-ScriptishAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-21801641208858065622011-03-27T15:22:45.698+08:002011-03-27T15:22:45.698+08:00这个好像和userChromeJS(http://userchromejs.mozdev.org/)...这个好像和userChromeJS(http://userchromejs.mozdev.org/)<br />安装这个之后userChromeJS下管理的脚本就失效了,是什么原因?Sweethttp://iamsweet.me/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-64200976490389582562011-03-27T13:28:07.513+08:002011-03-27T13:28:07.513+08:00facebook switch accounts在Scriptish上無法正式運作。facebook switch accounts在Scriptish上無法正式運作。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-19807260936666603182011-03-27T12:45:39.346+08:002011-03-27T12:45:39.346+08:00stylish和greasemonkey是分工比较明确的两个扩展,stylish管理css文件,gm...stylish和greasemonkey是分工比较明确的两个扩展,stylish管理css文件,gm负责gm脚本,不是功能相同的一类扩展;<br /><br /><br />新版gm取消添加/排除功能不知道怎么想的。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-30143981889178521872011-03-27T10:56:54.712+08:002011-03-27T10:56:54.712+08:00有没有人比较Stylish和Greasemonkey这两个插件呢?有没有人比较Stylish和Greasemonkey这两个插件呢?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38564685.post-69432360655907006772011-03-27T08:03:06.377+08:002011-03-27T08:03:06.377+08:00呵呵,實際感覺上確實沒有什麼不同
因為greasemonkey本身也不是太肥大的套件
不過從Sc...呵呵,實際感覺上確實沒有什麼不同<br />因為greasemonkey本身也不是太肥大的套件<br /><br /><br />不過從Scriptish的設計概念上來看,<br />他的程式碼確實更精簡,<br />另外他有提到新的架構讓scripts只有在需要時才會載入記憶體,<br />所以從更精簡、對資源佔用更好這兩點來看,它才說自己有更好的效能<br /><br />這個可能要更長期去比較記憶體、cpu佔用等等才會知道,不過這就不是我能做的測試了^^Esor Huanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10426807330996372963noreply@blogger.com